For more than forty years, Chicago has kept its tradition of dyeing its river green for St. Patrick's Day. Contrary to popular belief, although the city promotes the event, it does not pay for it. It's sponsored by the local plumbers' union and started when that group used fluorescein dye to trace illegal substances that were polluting the river more than 40 years ago. The EPA has since banned the use of fluorescein for this purpose and today more than 40 gallons pounds of vegetable dye are used to turn the river green.
Although the dying of the river is to celebrate St. Patrick's Day, the event itself takes place on the closest Saturday to St. Patrick's Day. This year, it fell on Saturday, March 10, just prior to the official start of AIChE Spring 2011. But several staff members were there and captured some photos from this year's "greening of the river." I like to think of it as "ChEnected Green," or at least pretty close!
The AIChE Foundation raises funds to support projects and activities that further the Institute's mission and enable the profession of chemical engineering to have a greater impact on the world. Donations small and large make a difference.
Energy pundits frequently warn that wind and solar power intermittency undermine grid reliability; and they advocate either backing up fickle renewables with fossil fuel power plants, usually nat-gas peaker plants, or bulking up with newly developed grid-scale storage. Armed with persuasive computer modeling (I'm a sucker for even cut rate CGI), Amory Lovins, the founder of the Rocky Mountain Institute, is in high-contrarian mode as he explains why he thinks that's a myth.
Instead, Lovins advocates a grid-based, software solution, or what he calls a “choreography” between supply and demand, using predictive computer models to anticipate production and consumption and then slow-dancing the two by intelligently routing power where it’s needed. He's probably been following "virtual power plant" demonstrations in Germany, where researchers use software to combine a wide array of distributed energy sources into a single, dispatchable power plant.
He also dresses up his supply and demand two-step with a soupçon of energy efficiency to make his case that the US can easily meet its energy needs without storage — and without missteps like rolling brown-outs or a total crash. So while he doesn't think investments in massive amounts of grid storage are necessary, obviously, he's assuming that someone's going to rebuild the country's aging, "dumb" grid. That's where he's putting his money to work.
Actually his cyberized energy paradigm is "storage-lite," tossing in thermal ice-storage, which has already shaved demand by about 30 percent for energy intensive buildings, and smart charging from aggregated fleets of electric vehicles. But, ultimately, even with that extra storage, Lovins thinks that adding massive amounts of storage just steps on the toes of renewables.
Fancy Yourself a Writer? We're looking for authors for The Reactor and contributors of video, humor, book reviews, challenges/brain teasers, and polls for ChEnected pages. You'll be credited in the post. Find out more at Chenected.aiche.org/contribute